Posts Tagged ‘conservative’

CONSERVATIVE ORTHODONTIC: LINGUAL ARCH

Tuesday, June 7th, 2011

Del 1 to the 4 June 2011 was held at the Palacio de Congresos de Barcelona the 57th Meeting of the Spanish Society of Orthodontics. The day 3 June at 12.00 h. presented the conference ” Conservative Orthodontics: Lingual Arch”. I presented a literature review of maintenance Drift Space, basic foundation of orthodontics Conservative,since 1947 published by Nance , Morrees, Singer, Gafhari, Profit, Rebelato, etc. The review also showed a table of the latest studies of the lingual arch made in different schools in the U.S., our study compared well with other authors as Gianelly, Dugoni,Rebellato, Villalobos, etc. In this comparison table demonstrate that our cases have an average of crowding 9.58 mm., 3 times more than other authors ( be our range 7 mm. and 18mm.); and our results were the 98% success, tanbien 3 times higher than other studies. The difference may be due to the use of a Fixed Lingual Arch Arches Active vs. used by other authors who were passive. It is also crucial to use 2 phases of orthodontic treatment. At the end of the communication were several clinical cases for the audience to see the severity of cases treated without extractions TOOTH order to protect the patient's face a collapse of the profile and prevent facial aging due to the retraction of the lips as a result of withdrawals received. As a final conclusion we can say that these treatments are beneficial to the aesthetics of the orthodontic patient and smile; be essential to initiate these Orthodontics in mixed dentition, or, still milk teeth. Being the right age for the 1st Orthodontics on 8-9 age, and the 2 nd to Orthodontics 11-12 years or so.

CONSERVATIVE ORTHODONTIC: Recovering 16 MM. OF LACK OF SPACE

Tuesday, June 7th, 2011

This presentation was held at the hall of the Palacio de Congresos HJ Barcelona on 1 June 2011 to 16.45 h. At the 57th Meeting of the Spanish Society of Orthodontics, during the program of clinical cases. The presentation of this case of Orthodontics Conservative corresponds to a child 9 years with lack of space for the location of 4 permanent canine; besides having a lower incisor crowding coupled with the lack of space accounted for canines 16 mm. ALD of the discrepancy Longitud arcade Bottom. In the arcade above the lack of space was 9 mm. ALD of themmiscrepancy Longitud arcade Higher. The case was treated following the protocol of 7 Conservative principles of Orthodontics, namely, TOOTH EXTRACTION WITHOUT, RAPID EXPANSION OR PALATE. The treatment was performed in the mixed dentition and 2 phases of orthodontic treatment. The Phase 1 was a Conservative orthodontic mechanics in the upper arch of 4×2with fixed orthodontic appliances and headgear of Kloh. And mechanics in the lower arch lingual arch was fixed assets. Stage 2 of Orthodontics Conservative was fixed orthodontic upper and lower. The aesthetic results were excellent , function and stability. Holding registers were presented to 18 months , 3 years 10 years post-orthodontic.